Angela

 For three branches, first the senators and the tribunes advised the consuls and were able to pass and veto laws. Their powers were kept in check by the Assembly which was allowed to approve or reject new laws but single-all-powerful ruler, he (she) makes the law and people votes. When they have too much difference then the ruler follow the most voted one. I think single-all-powerful ruler will be better because it has lesser steps than three branches and it will be more easy and the most important thing is it’s fair to everyone. For three branches, if consuls don’t agree then the assembly can’t vote until the consuls change their mind. And if senators of tribunes changed their idea to what the consuls like, maybe the assembly would like the original one because consuls pick what they want and senators or tribunes makes idea that everyone will like. So, I think single-all-powerful ruler is better.