Se+Ho

September 5, 2011 - What are two of the differences between a system of government with three branches and a system with a single all-powerful ruler? Which one is better and why? (Complete using Pages, but do not print. You will be given more instructions next class.)

A system with a government system with three branches and a single-power ruler has many differences. For examples, one government has three branches and the other one has one main ruler and for a three-branch government, all members of the government branch must vote on laws and ideas. Unlike the fact where a self-ruler can make the ideas with his own choice. I think that a three-branch government is better.

One, is because the fact where there would be more discussion based on the law or idea to gain some more better thoughts for not only their government, but for their citizens. Two, a self-proclaimed ruler wouldn’t have to make his own rule ever again. A lot of rules that a self-proclaimed leader would create would often lead to what he wanted, not the citizens. Three, the majority leads to more of what the citizens want than the minority want. The majority is what matters for creating laws or ideas, because its what most of them had voted for.